Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122r of the Thermochemical Network [3] This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122q [4, 5] to include a non-rigid rotor anharmonic oscillator (NRRAO) partition function for hydroxymethyl [6], as well as data on 42 additional species, some of which are related to soot formation mechanisms.
|
Species Name |
Formula |
Image |
ΔfH°(0 K) |
ΔfH°(298.15 K) |
Uncertainty |
Units |
Relative Molecular Mass |
ATcT ID |
Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 30 H2O) | | | -321.10 | ± 0.16 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*820 |
|
Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of HF (aq, 30 H2O)The 9 contributors listed below account for 83.2% of the provenance of ΔfH° of HF (aq, 30 H2O).
Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.
|
Contribution (%) | TN ID | Reaction | Measured Quantity | Reference | 19.0 | 4382.1 | CF4 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) → CO2 (g) + 4 HF (aq, 20 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -41.38 ± 0.32 kcal/mol | Cox 1965, as quoted by Cox 1970, Domalski 1967 | 17.8 | 456.1 | 1/2 H2 (g) + 1/2 F2 (g) → HF (aq, 50 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -76.68 ± 0.09 kcal/mol | King 1968 | 12.7 | 459.3 | HF (g) → HF (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -14.81 ± 0.10 kcal/mol | Vanderzee 1971, Westrum 1949, Davis 1961, Ruterjans 1969 | 12.7 | 458.1 | HF (g) + [OH]- (aq) → F- (aq) + H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -28.065 ± 0.10 kcal/mol | Vanderzee 1971 | 7.9 | 5657.1 | CH2F2 (g) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 HF (aq, 23 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -139.83 ± 0.22 kcal/mol | Neugebauer 1958, as quoted by Cox 1970 | 3.1 | 459.2 | HF (g) → HF (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -14.75 ± 0.20 kcal/mol | Hood 1951, Vanderzee 1971, Parker 1965, est unc | 3.1 | 459.1 | HF (g) → HF (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -14.82 ± 0.20 kcal/mol | Khaidukov 1936, Vanderzee 1971, Parker 1965, est unc | 3.1 | 457.1 | HF (g) → HF (aq, 400 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -11.56 ± 0.20 kcal/mol | Wartenberg 1926, Vanderzee 1971, Parker 1965 | 3.1 | 458.2 | HF (g) + [OH]- (aq) → F- (aq) + H2O (cr,l)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -27.93 ± 0.20 kcal/mol | Vanderzee 1971 |
|
Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of HF (aq, 30 H2O) |
Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances. The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.
|
Correlation Coefficent (%) | Species Name | Formula | Image | ΔfH°(0 K) | ΔfH°(298.15 K) | Uncertainty | Units | Relative Molecular Mass | ATcT ID | 99.9 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 37 H2O) | | | -321.13 | ± 0.16 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*890 | 99.9 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 35 H2O) | | | -321.12 | ± 0.16 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*904 | 99.9 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 40 H2O) | | | -321.14 | ± 0.16 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*821 | 99.9 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 45 H2O) | | | -321.15 | ± 0.16 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*906 | 99.9 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 50 H2O) | | | -321.16 | ± 0.16 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*822 | 99.9 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 55.51 H2O) | | | -321.18 | ± 0.16 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*891 | 99.9 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 55 H2O) | | | -321.18 | ± 0.16 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*905 | 99.8 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq, 60 H2O) | | | -321.18 | ± 0.16 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*823 | 99.8 | Hydrogen fluoride | HF (aq) | | | -334.50 | ± 0.16 | kJ/mol | 20.006343 ± 0.000070 | 7664-39-3*800 | 99.8 | Fluoride | F- (aq) | | | -334.50 | ± 0.16 | kJ/mol | 18.99895178 ± 0.00000050 | 16984-48-8*800 |
|
Most Influential reactions involving HF (aq, 30 H2O)Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.
|
Influence Coefficient | TN ID | Reaction | Measured Quantity | Reference | 0.490 | 481.2 | HF (aq, 30 H2O) → HF (aq, 35 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -0.0046 ± 0.001 kcal/mol | note HFc, Johnson 1973 | 0.488 | 482.2 | HF (aq, 30 H2O) → HF (aq, 37 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -0.0062 ± 0.001 kcal/mol | note HFc, Johnson 1973 | 0.201 | 464.2 | HF (aq, 30 H2O) → HF (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3.2050 ± 0.004 kcal/mol | Johnson 1973 | 0.122 | 481.1 | HF (aq, 30 H2O) → HF (aq, 35 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -0.0046 ± 0.002 kcal/mol | note HFc, Parker 1965 | 0.122 | 482.1 | HF (aq, 30 H2O) → HF (aq, 37 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -0.0061 ± 0.002 kcal/mol | note HFc, Parker 1965 | 0.089 | 464.1 | HF (aq, 30 H2O) → HF (aq)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -3.200 ± 0.006 kcal/mol | Parker 1965 | 0.071 | 784.1 | FCl(F)(F)(F)F (g) + 3 H2 (g) → HCl (aq, 100 H2O) + 5 HF (aq, 30 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -365.93 ± 1.58 kcal/mol | Armstrong 1969, Oberholtzer 1971, King 1970 | 0.055 | 769.1 | FCl(F)F (g) + 2 H2 (g) → HCl (aq, 100 H2O) + 3 HF (aq, 30 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -963.80 ± 5.05 kJ/mol | King 1970 | 0.006 | 5029.1 | CH2CF2 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 2 HF (aq, 30 H2O)  | ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -259.80 ± 2.40 kcal/mol | Kolesov 1962, as quoted by Pedley 1986 |
|
|
References
|
1
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004)
[DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
|
2
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005)
[DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
|
3
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122r of the Thermochemical Network, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2021 [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1822363]; available at ATcT.anl.gov
|
4
|
|
D. Feller, D. H. Bross, and B. Ruscic,
Enthalpy of Formation of C2H2O4 (Oxalic Acid) from High-Level Calculations and the Active Thermochemical Tables Approach.
J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 3481-3496 (2019)
[DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b12329]
|
5
|
|
B. K. Welch, R. Dawes, D. H. Bross, and B. Ruscic,
An Automated Thermochemistry Protocol Based on Explicitly Correlated Coupled-Cluster Theory: The Methyl and Ethyl Peroxy Families.
J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 5673-5682 (2019)
[DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b12329]
|
6
|
|
D. H. Bross, H.-G. Yu, L. B. Harding, and B. Ruscic,
Active Thermochemical Tables: The Partition Function of Hydroxymethyl (CH2OH) Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 4212-4231 (2019)
[DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b02295]
|
7
|
|
B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014)
[DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
|
|