Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122p of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122o [4] to include an updated enthalpy of formation for Hydrazine. [5].

Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
TetrachloromethaneCCl4 (g)C(Cl)(Cl)(Cl)Cl-93.41-95.58± 0.43kJ/mol153.8215 ±
0.0037		56-23-5*0

Representative Geometry of CCl4 (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of CCl4 (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 68.0% of the provenance of ΔfH° of CCl4 (g).
A total of 132 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)		TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
48.84136.2 CCl4 (l) + 2 H2O (cr,l) → CO2 (g) + 4 HCl (aq, 600 H2O) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -86.02 ± 0.14 kcal/molHu 1969
3.24480.2 CHCl3 (l) + 1/2 O2 (g) + H2O (cr,l) → CO2 (g) + 3 HCl (aq, 600 H2O) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -113.10 ± 0.20 kcal/molHu 1969
3.14489.1 Br2 (g) + CCl4 (g) → BrCl (g) + CCl3Br (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 8.84 ± 0.30 kcal/molMendenhall 1973, as quoted by Pedley 1986
1.54291.4 2 CCl3CCl3 (g) + 3 CH4 (g) → 3 CCl4 (g) + 2 CH3CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 17.46 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
1.44336.1 2 CCl4 (g) → CCl2CCl2 (g) + 2 Cl2 (g) ΔrG°(696.6 K) = 50.1 ± 5.8 kJ/molHuybrechts 1996, Manion 2002, 3rd Law
1.04290.1 2 CCl4 (g) → CCl3CCl3 (g) + Cl2 (g) ΔrG°(696.6 K) = 42.8 ± 5.8 kJ/molHuybrechts 1996, Manion 2002, 3rd Law
0.94874.6 CO2 (g) + CCl4 (g) → 2 CCl2O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 12.82 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.84874.7 CO2 (g) + CCl4 (g) → 2 CCl2O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 11.28 ± 0.9 (×1.189) kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.84132.6 CCl4 (g) + 4 F (g) → CF4 (g) + 4 Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -158.3 ± 1.1 kcal/molFeller 2003b, est unc
0.74134.2 CCl4 (g) + 2 H2 (g) → C (graphite) + 4 HCl (g) ΔrH°(293 K) = -65.5 ± 1.2 kcal/molBodenstein 1926a, Stull 1961, as quoted by Cox 1970, JANAF 2
0.64431.2 4 CH3Br (g) + CCl4 (g) → 4 CH3Cl (g) + CBr4 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 3.39 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.64130.4 CCl4 (g) + 4 H (g) → CH4 (g) + 4 Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -85.00 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.64132.4 CCl4 (g) + 4 F (g) → CF4 (g) + 4 Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -158.05 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.54402.4 CH3Cl (g) + 3 Cl (g) → CCl4 (g) + 3 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 63.59 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.54490.1 Br2 (g) + CHCl3 (g) → HBr (g) + CCl3Br (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -1.41 ± 0.10 kcal/molMendenhall 1973, as quoted by Pedley 1986
0.54130.3 CCl4 (g) + 4 H (g) → CH4 (g) + 4 Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -84.83 ± 1.4 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.54132.3 CCl4 (g) + 4 F (g) → CF4 (g) + 4 Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -157.90 ± 1.4 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.44874.5 CO2 (g) + CCl4 (g) → 2 CCl2O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.75 ± 1.1 (×1.297) kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.44129.1 CCl4 (g) → C (g) + 2 Cl2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 192.49 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.44128.5 CCl4 (g) → C (g) + 4 Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 305.57 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of CCl4 (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.

Correlation
Coefficent
(%)		Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass		 ATcT ID
99.5 TetrachloromethaneCCl4 (l)C(Cl)(Cl)(Cl)Cl-108.66-128.07± 0.43kJ/mol153.8215 ±
0.0037		56-23-5*500
35.2 BromotrichloromethaneCCl3Br (g)C(Cl)(Cl)(Cl)Br-32.57-41.72± 0.59kJ/mol198.2728 ±
0.0030		75-62-7*0
33.6 ChloroformCHCl3 (g)C(Cl)(Cl)Cl-97.29-102.19± 0.50kJ/mol119.3767 ±
0.0028		67-66-3*0
32.1 ChloroformCHCl3 (l)C(Cl)(Cl)Cl-133.59± 0.51kJ/mol119.3767 ±
0.0028		67-66-3*590
30.2 FluorotrichloromethaneCCl3F (g)C(Cl)(Cl)(Cl)F-285.27-288.43± 0.78kJ/mol137.3672 ±
0.0028		75-69-4*0
20.9 DichlorodifluoromethaneCF2Cl2 (g)C(F)(F)(Cl)Cl-489.46-493.65± 0.67kJ/mol120.9129 ±
0.0020		75-71-8*0
20.5 TrichloromethylCCl3 (g)[C](Cl)(Cl)Cl72.0371.55± 0.84kJ/mol118.3688 ±
0.0028		3170-80-7*0
20.0 HexachloroethaneCCl3CCl3 (g)C(C(Cl)(Cl)Cl)(Cl)(Cl)Cl-147.0-149.4± 1.3kJ/mol236.7376 ±
0.0056		67-72-1*0
18.7 Trichloromethylium[CCl3]+ (g)[C+](Cl)(Cl)Cl854.36852.84± 0.93kJ/mol118.3683 ±
0.0028		27130-34-3*0
16.5 DichlorodibromomethaneCCl2Br2 (g)C(Cl)(Cl)(Br)Br20.84.9± 1.3kJ/mol242.7241 ±
0.0028		594-18-3*0

Most Influential reactions involving CCl4 (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient		 TN
ID		 Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.3584135.5 CCl4 (l) → CCl4 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 7.752 ± 0.012 (×1.297) kcal/molWadso 1966
0.3104616.4 CCl4 (g) + CBr4 (g) → 2 CCl2Br2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.37 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.3104135.1 CCl4 (l) → CCl4 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 32.55 ± 0.07 kJ/molManion 2002
0.2564616.3 CCl4 (g) + CBr4 (g) → 2 CCl2Br2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.25 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.2374135.2 CCl4 (l) → CCl4 (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 32.54 ± 0.08 kJ/molMajer 1985
0.2204489.1 Br2 (g) + CCl4 (g) → BrCl (g) + CCl3Br (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 8.84 ± 0.30 kcal/molMendenhall 1973, as quoted by Pedley 1986
0.1724291.4 2 CCl3CCl3 (g) + 3 CH4 (g) → 3 CCl4 (g) + 2 CH3CH3 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 17.46 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.1484607.6 CF2Cl2 (g) + CCl4 (g) → 2 CCl3F (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.81 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.1364615.4 CCl4 (g) + CBr3Cl (g) → CCl2Br2 (g) + CCl3Br (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.20 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.1194607.4 CF2Cl2 (g) + CCl4 (g) → 2 CCl3F (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 3.29 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.1184604.6 CF4 (g) + CCl4 (g) → 2 CF2Cl2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 9.48 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.1134617.4 CCl4 (g) + CBr4 (g) → CCl3Br (g) + CBr3Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.30 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.1124615.3 CCl4 (g) + CBr3Cl (g) → CCl2Br2 (g) + CCl3Br (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.18 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0994431.2 4 CH3Br (g) + CCl4 (g) → 4 CH3Cl (g) + CBr4 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 3.39 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0994607.3 CF2Cl2 (g) + CCl4 (g) → 2 CCl3F (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.92 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0974376.2 CI4 (g) + 4 HCl (g) → CCl4 (g) + 4 HI (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 14.17 ± 3.1 kcal/molRuscic unpub
0.0974372.2 CI4 (g) + 4 Cl (g) → CCl4 (g) + 4 I (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -113.50 ± 3.1 kcal/molRuscic unpub
0.0954604.4 CF4 (g) + CCl4 (g) → 2 CF2Cl2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.85 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0934617.3 CCl4 (g) + CBr4 (g) → CCl3Br (g) + CBr3Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.16 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0914376.3 CI4 (g) + 4 HCl (g) → CCl4 (g) + 4 HI (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 14.75 ± 3.2 kcal/molRuscic unpub
References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122p of the Thermochemical Network (2020); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   P. B. Changala, T. L. Nguyen, J. H. Baraban, G. B. Ellison, J. F. Stanton, D. H. Bross, and B. Ruscic,
Active Thermochemical Tables: The Adiabatic Ionization Energy of Hydrogen Peroxide.
J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 8799-8806 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b06221] (highlighted on the journal cover)
5   D. Feller, D. H. Bross, and B. Ruscic,
Enthalpy of Formation of N2H4 (Hydrazine) Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 6187-6198 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b06017]
6   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.