Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122o of the Thermochemical Network [3] This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122h [4] to include the ionization energy of H2O2. [5].
|
Species Name |
Formula |
Image |
ΔfH°(0 K) |
ΔfH°(298.15 K) |
Uncertainty |
Units |
Relative Molecular Mass |
ATcT ID |
Aminyliumyl | [NH]+ (g) | | 1659.03 | 1659.95 | ± 0.24 | kJ/mol | 15.014131 ± 0.000099 | 19067-62-0*0 |
|
Representative Geometry of [NH]+ (g) |
|
spin ON spin OFF |
|
Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of [NH]+ (g)The 20 contributors listed below account only for 80.9% of the provenance of ΔfH° of [NH]+ (g). A total of 33 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.
Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.
|
|
Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of [NH]+ (g) |
Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances. The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.
|
Correlation Coefficent (%) | Species Name | Formula | Image | ΔfH°(0 K) | ΔfH°(298.15 K) | Uncertainty | Units | Relative Molecular Mass | ATcT ID | 66.8 | Imidogen | NH (g) | | 358.74 | 358.78 | ± 0.17 | kJ/mol | 15.014680 ± 0.000099 | 13774-92-0*0 | 66.8 | Imidogen | NH (g, triplet) | | 358.74 | 358.78 | ± 0.17 | kJ/mol | 15.014680 ± 0.000099 | 13774-92-0*1 | 66.8 | Imidogen anion | [NH]- (g) | | 322.62 | 322.67 | ± 0.17 | kJ/mol | 15.015229 ± 0.000099 | 23841-33-0*0 | 62.6 | Imidogen | NH (g, singlet) | | 509.33 | 509.38 | ± 0.18 | kJ/mol | 15.014680 ± 0.000099 | 13774-92-0*2 | 15.7 | Amidogen | NH2 (g) | | 188.91 | 186.02 | ± 0.11 | kJ/mol | 16.02262 ± 0.00016 | 13770-40-6*0 | 15.6 | Azanylium | [NH2]+ (g) | | 1266.55 | 1264.48 | ± 0.11 | kJ/mol | 16.02207 ± 0.00016 | 15194-15-7*0 | 14.8 | Isocyanic acid | HNCO (g) | | -116.01 | -119.00 | ± 0.30 | kJ/mol | 43.02478 ± 0.00086 | 75-13-8*0 | 9.9 | Cyanooxidanyl | NCO (g) | | 126.89 | 127.37 | ± 0.34 | kJ/mol | 42.01684 ± 0.00086 | 22400-26-6*0 | 8.6 | Isocyanic acid cation | [HNCO]+ (g) | | 1002.94 | 1000.27 | ± 0.50 | kJ/mol | 43.02423 ± 0.00086 | 444010-28-0*0 | 7.5 | Nitrogen atom | N (g) | | 470.579 | 472.441 | ± 0.024 | kJ/mol | 14.006740 ± 0.000070 | 17778-88-0*0 |
|
Most Influential reactions involving [NH]+ (g)Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.
|
Influence Coefficient | TN ID | Reaction | Measured Quantity | Reference | 0.801 | 1411.1 | NH (g) → [NH]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.476 ± 0.002 eV | de Beer 1991 | 0.128 | 1411.2 | NH (g) → [NH]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.480 ± 0.005 eV | Garcia 2015, note unc2 | 0.025 | 1425.5 | N+ (g) + H2 (g) → [NH]+ (g) + H (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.016 ± 0.015 eV | Tarroni 1997, Tosi 1994, est unc | 0.017 | 1411.3 | NH (g) → [NH]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.49 ± 0.01 (×1.354) eV | Dunlavey 1980 | 0.010 | 1425.1 | N+ (g) + H2 (g) → [NH]+ (g) + H (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.033 ± 0.024 eV | Ervin 1987 | 0.009 | 1425.2 | N+ (g) + H2 (g) → [NH]+ (g) + H (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.046 ± 0.016 (×1.509) eV | Ervin 1987, Adams 1985 | 0.008 | 1412.8 | NH (g) → [NH]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.471 ± 0.020 eV | Dixon 2001, note unc3 | 0.007 | 1419.1 | [NH]+ (g) → N+ (g) + H (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 102.99 ± 0.63 kcal/mol | Galek 2006 | 0.006 | 1425.3 | N+ (g) + H2 (g) → [NH]+ (g) + H (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.022 ± 0.03 eV | Ervin 1987, Marquette 1985, est unc | 0.006 | 1425.4 | N+ (g) + H2 (g) → [NH]+ (g) + H (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.0185 ± 0.03 eV | Ervin 1987, Luine 1985, est unc | 0.004 | 1423.1 | NH2 (g) → [NH]+ (g) + H (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 17.440 ± 0.005 (×7.179) eV | Gibson 1985 | 0.002 | 1412.9 | NH (g) → [NH]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.471 ± 0.040 eV | Parthiban 2001, Ruscic W1RO, Ruscic W1U | 0.001 | 1415.8 | [NH]+ (g) → N (g) + H (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -232.22 ± 1.50 kcal/mol | Ruscic W1RO | 0.001 | 1415.7 | [NH]+ (g) → N (g) + H (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -232.47 ± 1.60 kcal/mol | Ruscic CBS-n | 0.001 | 1415.4 | [NH]+ (g) → N (g) + H (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -231.34 ± 1.60 kcal/mol | Ruscic G4 | 0.001 | 1415.3 | [NH]+ (g) → N (g) + H (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -230.92 ± 1.72 kcal/mol | Ruscic G3X | 0.000 | 1415.6 | [NH]+ (g) → N (g) + H (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = -231.81 ± 2.16 kcal/mol | Ruscic CBS-n | 0.000 | 1412.4 | NH (g) → [NH]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.465 ± 0.073 eV | Ruscic G4 | 0.000 | 1412.7 | NH (g) → [NH]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.461 ± 0.075 eV | Ruscic CBS-n | 0.000 | 1412.3 | NH (g) → [NH]+ (g)  | ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.486 ± 0.093 eV | Ruscic G3X |
|
|
References
|
1
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004)
[DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
|
2
|
|
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005)
[DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
|
3
|
|
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122o of the Thermochemical Network (2020); available at ATcT.anl.gov |
4
|
|
Y.-C. Chang, B. Xiong, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and C. Y. Ng,
A Vacuum Ultraviolet laser Pulsed Field Ionization-Photoion Study of Methane (CH4): Determination of the Appearance Energy of Methylium From Methane with Unprecedented Precision and the Resulting Impact on the Bond Dissociation Energies of CH4 and CH4+.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 9592-9605 (2017)
[DOI: 10.1039/c6cp08200a] (part of 2017 PCCP Hot Articles collection)
|
5
|
|
P. B. Changala, T. L. Nguyen, J. H. Baraban, G. B. Ellison, J. F. Stanton, D. H. Bross, and B. Ruscic,
Active Thermochemical Tables: The Adiabatic Ionization Energy of Hydrogen Peroxide.
J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 8799-8806 (2017)
[DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b06221] (highlighted on the journal cover)
|
6
|
|
B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014)
[DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
|
|
|
Formula
|
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.
|
|
Uncertainties
|
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
|
|
Website Functionality Credits
|
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.
|
|
Acknowledgement
|
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.
|