Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122b of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122 [4][5] to include the best possible isomerization of HCN and HNC [6].

Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass
ATcT ID
Propadienylidenide[CH2CC]- (g)C=C=[C-]381.18382.08± 0.43kJ/mol38.0485 ±
0.0024
109292-49-1*0

Representative Geometry of [CH2CC]- (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of [CH2CC]- (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 68.5% of the provenance of ΔfH° of [CH2CC]- (g).
A total of 224 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
13.02462.5 CH2CC (g) → 3 C (g) + 2 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2011.58 ± 1.0 kJ/molVazquez 2009
10.72462.6 CH2CC (g) → 3 C (g) + 2 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2011.18 ± 1.1 kJ/molVazquez 2009, est unc
7.32421.1 CH2CCH (g) → CH2CC (g) H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 416.69 ± 1.0 kJ/molVazquez 2009, est unc
6.42423.6 C(CHCH) (g) → 3 C (g) + 2 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2068.97 ± 1.0 kJ/molVazquez 2009
6.12421.2 CH2CCH (g) → CH2CC (g) H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 416.71 ± 1.1 kJ/molVazquez 2009, est unc
5.32423.7 C(CHCH) (g) → 3 C (g) + 2 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2068.71 ± 1.1 kJ/molVazquez 2009, est unc
4.12464.1 [CH2CC]- (g) → CH2CC (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 14483 ± 8 cm-1Stanton 2012
3.12467.14 C(CHCH) (g) → CH2CC (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 57.39 ± 0.6 kJ/molVazquez 2009, est unc
3.12467.15 C(CHCH) (g) → CH2CC (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 57.53 ± 0.6 kJ/molVazquez 2009, est unc
1.82391.1 [CH2CCH]+ (g) → CH2CC (g) H+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 888.4 ± 2.0 kJ/molBotschwina 2010a
0.91565.2 CO (g) → C+ (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 22.3713 ± 0.0015 eVNg 2007
0.82491.6 CCCH (g) CH2 (g, singlet) → CH2CC (g) CH (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.56 ± 3 kJ/molAguilera-Iparraguirre 2008, est unc
0.82471.5 CH2CC (g) CH4 (g) → CH2CCH2 (g) CH2 (g, singlet) ΔrH°(0 K) = 32.87 ± 0.9 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.82378.12 CH2CCH (g) → 3 C (g) + 3 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2428.27 ± 1.0 kJ/molVazquez 2009
0.62471.4 CH2CC (g) CH4 (g) → CH2CCH2 (g) CH2 (g, singlet) ΔrH°(0 K) = 33.55 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.62471.2 CH2CC (g) CH4 (g) → CH2CCH2 (g) CH2 (g, singlet) ΔrH°(0 K) = 32.90 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.62378.13 CH2CCH (g) → 3 C (g) + 3 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2427.89 ± 1.1 kJ/molVazquez 2009, est unc
0.52471.1 CH2CC (g) CH4 (g) → CH2CCH2 (g) CH2 (g, singlet) ΔrH°(0 K) = 33.11 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.5117.2 1/2 O2 (g) H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/molRossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
0.52468.11 HCCCH (g, triplet) → CH2CC (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 12.52 ± 3 kJ/molAguilera-Iparraguirre 2008, est unc

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of [CH2CC]- (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.


Correlation
Coefficent
(%)
Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass
ATcT ID
97.6 PropadienylideneCH2CC (g)C=C=[C]554.44555.59± 0.42kJ/mol38.0480 ±
0.0024
60731-10-4*0
65.7 CyclopropenylideneC(CHCH) (g)C1=C=C1497.07496.12± 0.47kJ/mol38.0480 ±
0.0024
16165-40-5*0
36.6 2-PropynylCH2CCH (g)[CH2]C#C354.00351.44± 0.38kJ/mol39.0559 ±
0.0024
2932-78-7*0
36.6 2-Propynylium[CH2CCH]+ (g)[CH2+]C#C1193.471190.66± 0.38kJ/mol39.0554 ±
0.0024
21540-27-2*0
32.9 Carbon atom cationC+ (g)[C+]1797.8531803.451± 0.050kJ/mol12.01015 ±
0.00080
14067-05-1*0
32.9 Carbon atomC (g, singlet)[C]833.332838.478± 0.050kJ/mol12.01070 ±
0.00080
7440-44-0*2
32.9 Carbon atomC (g, triplet)[C]711.401716.886± 0.050kJ/mol12.01070 ±
0.00080
7440-44-0*1
32.9 Carbon atomC (g)[C]711.401716.886± 0.050kJ/mol12.01070 ±
0.00080
7440-44-0*0
32.8 Carbon atom anionC- (g)[C-]589.624594.771± 0.050kJ/mol12.01125 ±
0.00080
14337-00-9*0
31.2 PropynylideneHCCCH (g, triplet)[CH]=C=[CH]543.38546.37± 0.63kJ/mol38.0480 ±
0.0024
67152-18-5*1

Most Influential reactions involving [CH2CC]- (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.9432464.1 [CH2CC]- (g) → CH2CC (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 14483 ± 8 cm-1Stanton 2012
0.0462453.5 [CH2CC]- (g) → [HCCCH]- (g, transoid 2B) ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.04 ± 1.2 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0442454.5 [CH2CC]- (g) → [HCCCH]- (g, cisoid 2A) ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.69 ± 1.2 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0392453.2 [CH2CC]- (g) → [HCCCH]- (g, transoid 2B) ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.76 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0382454.2 [CH2CC]- (g) → [HCCCH]- (g, cisoid 2A) ΔrH°(0 K) = 14.29 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0372464.4 [CH2CC]- (g) → CH2CC (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.796 ± 0.005 eVOsborn 2014
0.0332453.1 [CH2CC]- (g) → [HCCCH]- (g, transoid 2B) ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.83 ± 1.4 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0322454.1 [CH2CC]- (g) → [HCCCH]- (g, cisoid 2A) ΔrH°(0 K) = 14.44 ± 1.4 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0262453.3 [CH2CC]- (g) → [HCCCH]- (g, transoid 2B) ΔrH°(0 K) = 13.49 ± 1.6 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0252454.3 [CH2CC]- (g) → [HCCCH]- (g, cisoid 2A) ΔrH°(0 K) = 14.10 ± 1.6 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0142464.2 [CH2CC]- (g) → CH2CC (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.794 ± 0.008 eVRobinson 1995
0.0042466.4 [CH2CC]- (g) → 3 C (g) + 2 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 522.71 ± 1.50 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.0032466.3 [CH2CC]- (g) → 3 C (g) + 2 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 522.77 ± 1.60 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.0032466.1 [CH2CC]- (g) → 3 C (g) + 2 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 523.57 ± 1.72 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.0022466.2 [CH2CC]- (g) → 3 C (g) + 2 H (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 524.10 ± 1.60 (×1.164) kcal/molRuscic G4
0.0012464.3 [CH2CC]- (g) → CH2CC (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.794 ± 0.025 eVOakes 1986
0.0002464.9 [CH2CC]- (g) → CH2CC (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.80 ± 0.05 eVOsborn 2014, est unc
0.0002464.8 [CH2CC]- (g) → CH2CC (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.818 ± 0.050 eVRuscic W1RO
0.0002464.6 [CH2CC]- (g) → CH2CC (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.846 ± 0.061 eVRuscic G4
0.0002464.5 [CH2CC]- (g) → CH2CC (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 1.810 ± 0.085 eVRuscic G3X


References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122b of the Thermochemical Network (2016); available at ATcT.anl.gov
4   B. Ruscic,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Sequential Bond Dissociation Enthalpies of Methane, Ethane, and Methanol and the Related Thermochemistry.
J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 7810-7837 (2015) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b01346]
5   S. J. Klippenstein, L. B. Harding, and B. Ruscic,
Ab initio Computations and Active Thermochemical Tables Hand in Hand: Heats of Formation of Core Combustion Species.
J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 6580-6602 (2017) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b05945]
6   T. L. Nguyen, J. H. Baraban, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton,
On the HCN – HNC Energy Difference.
J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 10929-10934 (2015) [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b08406]
7   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]

Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [7]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.