Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[4] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.128 [5,6] to include with the calculations provided in reference [4].

Chloroethane

Formula: CH3CH2Cl (cr,l)
CAS RN: 75-00-3
ATcT ID: 75-00-3*500
SMILES: CCCl
InChI: InChI=1S/C2H5Cl/c1-2-3/h2H2,1H3
InChIKey: HRYZWHHZPQKTII-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Hills Formula: C2H5Cl1

2D Image:

CCCl
Aliases: CH3CH2Cl; Chloroethane; Ethyl chloride; Monochloroethane; Monochlorethane; Hydrochloric ether; CH3CH2Cl g; CH3CH2Cl l; CH3CH2Cl cr, l; CH3CH2Cl cr,l; C2H5Cl g; C2H5Cl l; C2H5Cl cr, l; C2H5Cl cr,l; F 160; R 160; Aethylis; Aethylis chloridum; Anodynon; Chelen; Chlorene; Chlorethyl; Chloridum; Chloryl; Chloryl Anesthetic; Chloryle anesthetic; Cloretilo; Dublofix; Ether chloratus; Ether hydrochloric; Ether muriatic; Kelene; Muriatic ether; Narcotile
Relative Molecular Mass: 64.5138 ± 0.0019

   ΔfH°(0 K)   ΔfH°(298.15 K)UncertaintyUnits
-134.34-135.96± 0.25kJ/mol

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of CH3CH2Cl (cr,l)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 76.3% of the provenance of ΔfH° of CH3CH2Cl (cr,l).
A total of 98 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
33.85767.1 CH2CH2 (g) HCl (g) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrG°(471 K) = -10.007 ± 0.350 kJ/molLane 1953, 3rd Law
15.35764.1 CH3CH2Cl (g) + 3 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) HCl (aq, 600 H2O) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -1413.04 ± 0.59 kJ/molFletcher 1971
8.95767.3 CH2CH2 (g) HCl (g) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrG°(486.9 K) = -8.75 ± 0.47 (×1.445) kJ/molHowlett 1955, 3rd Law
3.45835.1 CH2CHCl (g) CH3CH3 (g) → CH3CH2Cl (g) CH2CH2 (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 0.49 ± 0.25 kcal/molKarton 2017, Karton 2011, Karton 2007, Karton 2006
2.35760.8 CH3CH2Cl (g) → 2 C (g) + 5 H (g) Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 650.11 ± 0.35 kcal/molKarton 2017
1.15771.4 CH2ClCH2Cl (g) CH3CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -1.29 ± 0.85 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
1.05771.2 CH2ClCH2Cl (g) CH3CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -1.05 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G4
1.05771.1 CH2ClCH2Cl (g) CH3CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -1.03 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.85769.13 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrG°(278.276 K) = 0.673 ± 0.092 kJ/molGordon 1948, 3rd Law, ThermoData 2004
0.85769.11 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrG°(283.123 K) = 0.246 ± 0.093 kJ/molHowlett 1955, 3rd Law, ThermoData 2004
0.82432.1 CH2CH2 (g) + 3 O2 (g) → 2 CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -1411.18 ± 0.30 kJ/molRossini 1937
0.85780.2 CH3CHCl2 (g) CH3CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.68 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.85780.4 CH3CHCl2 (g) CH3CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -1.33 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.85771.3 CH2ClCH2Cl (g) CH3CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -1.05 ± 1.00 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.82279.1 H2 (g) C (graphite) → CH4 (g) ΔrG°(1165 K) = 37.521 ± 0.068 kJ/molSmith 1946, note COf, 3rd Law
0.75769.4 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(285.42 K) = 24.897 ± 0.10 kJ/molGordon 1948, ThermoData 2004, Manion 2002
0.75780.1 CH3CHCl2 (g) CH3CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.46 ± 1.1 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.65769.9 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrG°(298.281 K) = -1.062 ± 0.105 kJ/molThermoData 2004, 3rd Law
0.6121.2 1/2 O2 (g) H2 (g) → H2O (cr,l) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = -285.8261 ± 0.040 kJ/molRossini 1939, Rossini 1931, Rossini 1931b, note H2Oa, Rossini 1930
0.55780.3 CH3CHCl2 (g) CH3CH3 (g) → 2 CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -0.54 ± 1.3 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of CH3CH2Cl (cr,l)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.


Correlation
Coefficent
(%)
Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass
ATcT ID
98.2 ChloroethaneCH3CH2Cl (g)CCCl-96.95-111.54± 0.25kJ/mol64.5138 ±
0.0019
75-00-3*0
33.1 EthyleneCH2CH2 (g)C=C60.8952.38± 0.11kJ/mol28.0532 ±
0.0016
74-85-1*0
33.1 Ethylene cation[CH2CH2]+ (g)C=[CH2+]1075.211068.00± 0.11kJ/mol28.0526 ±
0.0016
34470-02-5*0
27.3 EthaneCH3CH3 (g)CC-68.38-84.01± 0.12kJ/mol30.0690 ±
0.0017
74-84-0*0
21.1 PropaneCH3CH2CH3 (g)CCC-82.71-104.99± 0.16kJ/mol44.0956 ±
0.0025
74-98-6*0
18.5 Vinyl chlorideCH2CHCl (g)C=CCl29.3821.79± 0.27kJ/mol62.4979 ±
0.0018
75-01-4*0
18.3 CarbonC (g)[C]711.396716.881± 0.041kJ/mol12.01070 ±
0.00080
7440-44-0*0
18.3 CarbonC (g, triplet)[C]711.396716.881± 0.041kJ/mol12.01070 ±
0.00080
7440-44-0*1
18.3 CarbonC (g, quintuplet)[C]1114.9591120.105± 0.041kJ/mol12.01070 ±
0.00080
7440-44-0*3
18.3 CarbonC (g, singlet)[C]833.327838.474± 0.041kJ/mol12.01070 ±
0.00080
7440-44-0*2

Most Influential reactions involving CH3CH2Cl (cr,l)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.2555769.13 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrG°(278.276 K) = 0.673 ± 0.092 kJ/molGordon 1948, 3rd Law, ThermoData 2004
0.2495769.11 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrG°(283.123 K) = 0.246 ± 0.093 kJ/molHowlett 1955, 3rd Law, ThermoData 2004
0.2165769.4 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(285.42 K) = 24.897 ± 0.10 kJ/molGordon 1948, ThermoData 2004, Manion 2002
0.1965769.9 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrG°(298.281 K) = -1.062 ± 0.105 kJ/molThermoData 2004, 3rd Law
0.0275769.2 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 24.15 ± 0.24 (×1.164) kJ/molThermoData 2004
0.0245769.3 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 24.6 ± 0.3 kJ/molManion 2002
0.0135769.1 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 24.35 ± 0.40 kJ/molNBS Tables 1989
0.0095769.5 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(290.459 K) = 25.217 ± 0.10 (×4.757) kJ/molYates 1926, ThermoData 2004
0.0045769.6 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(298.15 K) = 25.138 ± 0.10 (×7.179) kJ/molYates 1926, ThermoData 2004
0.0015769.10 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(283.123 K) = 24.723 ± 1.314 kJ/molHowlett 1955, 2nd Law, ThermoData 2004
0.0015769.8 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(298.281 K) = 24.306 ± 1.361 kJ/molThermoData 2004, 2nd Law
0.0015769.12 CH3CH2Cl (cr,l) → CH3CH2Cl (g) ΔrH°(278.276 K) = 25.525 ± 1.378 kJ/molGordon 1948, 2nd Law, ThermoData 2004


References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2023; available at ATcT.anl.gov
[DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1997229]
4   N. Genossar, P. B. Changala, B. Gans, J.-C. Loison, S. Hartweg, M.-A. Martin-Drumel, G. A. Garcia, J. F. Stanton, B. Ruscic, and J. H. Baraban
Ring-Opening Dynamics of the Cyclopropyl Radical and Cation: the Transition State Nature of the Cyclopropyl Cation
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18518-18525 (2022) [DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c07740]
5   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross
Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects.
Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021) [DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
6   J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton,
Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions
J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021) [DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
7   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
8   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.