Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network [3]

This version of ATcT results[4] was generated by additional expansion of version 1.128 [5,6] to include with the calculations provided in reference [4].

Chlorine dioxide

Formula: OClO (g)
CAS RN: 10049-04-4
ATcT ID: 10049-04-4*0
SMILES: O=Cl=O
InChI: InChI=1S/ClO2/c2-1-3
InChIKey: OSVXSBDYLRYLIG-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Hills Formula: Cl1O2

2D Image:

O=Cl=O
Aliases: OClO; Chlorine dioxide; Dioxido-lambda5-chloranyl; Chlorosyloxidanyl; Chlorine peroxide; Chlorine (IV) oxide; Chloroperoxyl; Chlorosyloxy; Chloryl radical; Chlorine oxide; Alcide; Oxine
Relative Molecular Mass: 67.4515 ± 0.0011

   ΔfH°(0 K)   ΔfH°(298.15 K)UncertaintyUnits
101.4198.94± 0.29kJ/mol

3D Image of OClO (g)

spin ON           spin OFF
          

Top contributors to the provenance of ΔfH° of OClO (g)

The 20 contributors listed below account only for 84.7% of the provenance of ΔfH° of OClO (g).
A total of 35 contributors would be needed to account for 90% of the provenance.

Please note: The list is limited to 20 most important contributors or, if less, a number sufficient to account for 90% of the provenance. The Reference acts as a further link to the relevant references and notes for the measurement. The Measured Quantity is normaly given in the original units; in cases where we have reinterpreted the original measurement, the listed value may differ from that given by the authors. The quoted uncertainty is the a priori uncertainty used as input when constructing the initial Thermochemical Network, and corresponds either to the value proposed by the original authors or to our estimate; if an additional multiplier is given in parentheses immediately after the prior uncertainty, it corresponds to the factor by which the prior uncertainty needed to be multiplied during the ATcT analysis in order to make that particular measurement consistent with the prevailing knowledge contained in the Thermochemical Network.

Contribution
(%)
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
14.0947.1 OClO (g) → ClO (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 247.3 ± 0.5 (×1.509) kJ/molDelmdahl 2001
11.6942.12 OClO (g) → 2 O (g) Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 122.47 ± 0.20 kcal/molKarton 2009c
11.4947.2 OClO (g) → ClO (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 59.0 ± 0.2 kcal/molDavis 1996
8.7949.1 OClO (g) Br (g) → BrO (g) ClO (g) ΔrG°(298.15 K) = 6.80 ± 0.86 kJ/molClyne 1977, 3rd Law
5.2963.7 OCl(O)O (g) → Cl (g) + 3 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 160.08 ± 0.40 kcal/molKarton 2009c, Karton 2017
5.1942.11 OClO (g) → 2 O (g) Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 122.33 ± 0.30 kcal/molKarton 2006, Karton 2009c, Karton 2011
5.0947.10 OClO (g) → ClO (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 59.03 ± 0.30 kcal/molKarton 2009c
4.9968.7 OCl(O)O (g) ClO (g) → 2 OClO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -21.42 ± 0.20 kcal/molKarton 2009c
2.9942.10 OClO (g) → 2 O (g) Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 122.31 ± 0.40 kcal/molKarton 2009c, Martin 2008, Karton 2011
2.8947.9 OClO (g) → ClO (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 59.19 ± 0.40 kcal/molKarton 2009c
2.3963.6 OCl(O)O (g) → Cl (g) + 3 O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 159.68 ± 0.60 kcal/molKarton 2009c
2.2968.6 OCl(O)O (g) ClO (g) → 2 OClO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -21.50 ± 0.3 kcal/molKarton 2009c
1.4942.9 OClO (g) → 2 O (g) Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 122.14 ± 0.56 kcal/molKarton 2009c, Martin 2008, Karton 2011
1.4947.8 OClO (g) → ClO (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 59.04 ± 0.56 kcal/molKarton 2009c
1.21059.7 HOClO (g) → H (g) + 2 O (g) Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 192.11 ± 0.35 kcal/molKarton 2009c, Karton 2017
0.91059.6 HOClO (g) → H (g) + 2 O (g) Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 192.05 ± 0.40 kcal/molKarton 2009c
0.81062.7 HOClO (g) ClO (g) → HOCl (g) OClO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -23.75 ± 0.30 kcal/molKarton 2009c
0.7947.11 OClO (g) → ClO (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 59.30 ± 0.8 kcal/molGrant 2010, Matus 2008a
0.6930.1 ClO (g) → Cl (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 22182.3 ± 3 cm-1Coxon 1976, note ClO, note ClOa
0.41062.6 HOClO (g) ClO (g) → HOCl (g) OClO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -23.68 ± 0.40 kcal/molKarton 2009c

Top 10 species with enthalpies of formation correlated to the ΔfH° of OClO (g)

Please note: The correlation coefficients are obtained by renormalizing the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix by the corresponding variances.
The correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to 1, with 1 representing perfectly correlated species, -1 representing perfectly anti-correlated species, and 0 representing perfectly uncorrelated species.


Correlation
Coefficent
(%)
Species Name Formula Image    ΔfH°(0 K)    ΔfH°(298.15 K) Uncertainty Units Relative
Molecular
Mass
ATcT ID
78.1 Chlorite[OClO]- (g)O=[Cl-]=O-105.51-107.69± 0.37kJ/mol67.4520 ±
0.0011
14998-27-7*0
61.9 PerchlorylOCl(O)O (g)O=Cl(=O)[O]191.76186.09± 0.62kJ/mol83.4509 ±
0.0013
13932-10-0*0
53.4 Chloryl ion[OClO]+ (g)O=[Cl+]=O1100.261097.60± 0.53kJ/mol67.4510 ±
0.0011
25052-55-5*0
26.4 Chlorous acidHOClO (g)OCl=O25.7620.71± 0.63kJ/mol68.4594 ±
0.0011
13898-47-0*0
18.4 PerchloryloxyOCl(O)(O)O (g)O=Cl(=O)(=O)[O]248.4240.8± 1.8kJ/mol99.4503 ±
0.0015
12133-63-0*0
10.2 BromooxidanylBrO (g)[O]Br131.20123.66± 0.28kJ/mol95.9034 ±
0.0010
15656-19-6*0
9.8 Perchloryl cation[OCl(O)O]+ (g)O=[Cl+](=O)[O]1252.11246.4± 2.5kJ/mol83.4504 ±
0.0013
23594-88-9*0
9.2 Chlorate[OCl(O)O]- (g)O=Cl(=O)[O-]-208.2-213.7± 1.5kJ/mol83.4514 ±
0.0013
14866-68-3*0
8.5 Chloryl hydrideHCl(O)O (g)[H][Cl](=O)=O197.7191.2± 1.6kJ/mol68.4594 ±
0.0011
174365-32-3*0
8.2 ChlorooxidanylClO (g)Cl=O101.124101.716± 0.035kJ/mol51.45210 ±
0.00095
14989-30-1*0

Most Influential reactions involving OClO (g)

Please note: The list, which is based on a hat (projection) matrix analysis, is limited to no more than 20 largest influences.

Influence
Coefficient
TN
ID
Reaction Measured Quantity Reference
0.890944.1 [OClO]- (g) → OClO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.1451 ± 0.0025 eVDistelrath 2000
0.860943.1 OClO (g) → [OClO]+ (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 10.350 ± 0.005 eVFlesch 1993
0.385968.7 OCl(O)O (g) ClO (g) → 2 OClO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -21.42 ± 0.20 kcal/molKarton 2009c
0.2401062.7 HOClO (g) ClO (g) → HOCl (g) OClO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -23.75 ± 0.30 kcal/molKarton 2009c
0.208993.4 OCl(O)(O)O (g) OClO (g) → 2 OCl(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 7.78 ± 0.85 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.1981068.4 HCl(O)O (g) ClO (g) → HClO (g) OClO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -12.86 ± 0.85 kcal/molRuscic W1RO
0.188949.1 OClO (g) Br (g) → BrO (g) ClO (g) ΔrG°(298.15 K) = 6.80 ± 0.86 kJ/molClyne 1977, 3rd Law
0.186993.1 OCl(O)(O)O (g) OClO (g) → 2 OCl(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 8.78 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.1771068.2 HCl(O)O (g) ClO (g) → HClO (g) OClO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -13.09 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G4
0.1771068.1 HCl(O)O (g) ClO (g) → HClO (g) OClO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -13.20 ± 0.90 kcal/molRuscic G3X
0.171968.6 OCl(O)O (g) ClO (g) → 2 OClO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -21.50 ± 0.3 kcal/molKarton 2009c
0.156993.2 OCl(O)(O)O (g) OClO (g) → 2 OCl(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 9.03 ± 0.90 (×1.091) kcal/molRuscic G4
0.150993.3 OCl(O)(O)O (g) OClO (g) → 2 OCl(O)O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 8.19 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.1431068.3 HCl(O)O (g) ClO (g) → HClO (g) OClO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -14.11 ± 1.0 kcal/molRuscic CBS-n
0.143947.1 OClO (g) → ClO (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 247.3 ± 0.5 (×1.509) kJ/molDelmdahl 2001
0.1351062.6 HOClO (g) ClO (g) → HOCl (g) OClO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = -23.68 ± 0.40 kcal/molKarton 2009c
0.116942.12 OClO (g) → 2 O (g) Cl (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 122.47 ± 0.20 kcal/molKarton 2009c
0.116947.2 OClO (g) → ClO (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 59.0 ± 0.2 kcal/molDavis 1996
0.087969.8 OCl(O)O (g) → OClO (g) O (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 37.77 ± 0.40 kcal/molKarton 2009c
0.087944.2 [OClO]- (g) → OClO (g) ΔrH°(0 K) = 2.140 ± 0.008 eVGilles 1992


References
1   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited.
J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9979-9997 (2004) [DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
2   B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 16, 561-570 (2005) [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
3   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.130 of the Thermochemical Network. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2023; available at ATcT.anl.gov
[DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1997229]
4   N. Genossar, P. B. Changala, B. Gans, J.-C. Loison, S. Hartweg, M.-A. Martin-Drumel, G. A. Garcia, J. F. Stanton, B. Ruscic, and J. H. Baraban
Ring-Opening Dynamics of the Cyclopropyl Radical and Cation: the Transition State Nature of the Cyclopropyl Cation
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18518-18525 (2022) [DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c07740]
5   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross
Active Thermochemical Tables: The Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties of Methyl, CH3, and Methylene, CH2, Corrected for Nonrigid Rotor and Anharmonic Oscillator Effects.
Mol. Phys. e1969046 (2021) [DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2021.1969046]
6   J. H. Thorpe, J. L. Kilburn, D. Feller, P. B. Changala, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, and J. F. Stanton,
Elaborated Thermochemical Treatment of HF, CO, N2, and H2O: Insight into HEAT and Its Extensions
J. Chem. Phys. 155, 184109 (2021) [DOI: 10.1063/5.0069322]
7   B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1097-1101 (2014) [DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
8   B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross,
Thermochemistry
Computer Aided Chem. Eng. 45, 3-114 (2019) [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64087-1.00001-2]

Formula
The aggregate state is given in parentheses following the formula, such as: g - gas-phase, cr - crystal, l - liquid, etc.

Uncertainties
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.

Website Functionality Credits
The reorganization of the website was developed and implemented by David H. Bross (ANL).
The find function is based on the complete Species Dictionary entries for the appropriate version of the ATcT TN.
The molecule images are rendered by Indigo-depict.
The XYZ renderings are based on Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.