Selected ATcT [1, 2] enthalpy of formation based on version 1.122x of the Thermochemical Network [3]
This version of ATcT results was generated from an expansion of version 1.122v [4] to include species relevant to the study of bond dissociation enthalpies of representative aromatic aldehydes [5].
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, M. L. Morton, G. von Laszewski, S. Bittner, S. G. Nijsure, K. A. Amin, M. Minkoff, and A. F. Wagner,
Introduction to Active Thermochemical Tables: Several "Key" Enthalpies of Formation Revisited. J. Phys. Chem. A108, 9979-9997 (2004)
[DOI: 10.1021/jp047912y]
B. Ruscic, R. E. Pinzon, G. von Laszewski, D. Kodeboyina, A. Burcat, D. Leahy, D. Montoya, and A. F. Wagner,
Active Thermochemical Tables: Thermochemistry for the 21st Century. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.16, 561-570 (2005)
[DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/078]
B. Ruscic and D. H. Bross, Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.122x of the Thermochemical Network, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 2022; available at ATcT.anl.gov [DOI: 10.17038/CSE/1885922]
D. P. Zaleski, R. Sivaramakrishnan, H. R. Weller, N. A Seifert, D. H. Bross, B. Ruscic, K. B. Moore III, S. N. Elliott, A. V. Copan, L. B. Harding, S. J. Klippenstein, R. W. Field, and K. Prozument,
Substitution Reactions in the Pyrolysis of Acetone Revealed through a Modeling, Experiment, Theory Paradigm. J. Am. Chem. Soc.143, 3124-3152 (2021)
[DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c11677]
Y. Ren, L. Zhou, A. Mellouki, V. Daƫle, M. Idir, S. S. Brown, B. Ruscic, Robert S. Paton, M. R. McGillen, and A. R. Ravishankara,
Reactions of NO3 with Aromatic Aldehydes: Gas-Phase Kinetics and Insights into the Mechanism of the Reaction. Atmos. Chem. Phys.21, 13537-13551 (2021)
[DOI: 10.5194/acp2021-228]
B. Ruscic,
Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables. Int. J. Quantum Chem.114, 1097-1101 (2014)
[DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605]
The listed uncertainties correspond to estimated 95% confidence limits, as customary in thermochemistry (see, for example, Ruscic [6,7]).
Note that an uncertainty of ± 0.000 kJ/mol indicates that the estimated uncertainty is < ± 0.0005 kJ/mol.
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.