Bibliography #732,909

Reference Label	Details
Taniguchi 1999	N. Taniguchi, K. Takahashi, Y. Matsumi, S. M. Dylewski, J. D. Geiser, and P. L. Houston, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 6350-6355 (1999) Determination of the Heat of Formation of O3 using Vacuum Ultraviolet Laser-Induced Fluorescence Spectroscopy and Two-Dimensional Product Imaging Techniques
note O3d	Taniguchi 1999 report three experiments: one PHOFEX and two 2D fragment imaging. The PHOFEX shows an onset of 309.45 +- 0.03 nm = 32315.4 +- 3.1 cm-1 = 386.58 +- 0.04 kJ/mol, which is, as noted by the authors, somewhat higher (78.1 cm-1 or 0.93 kJ/mol) than the similar experiment of Takahashi 1997. Two 2D imaging experiments were performed, one at 305.746 nm and one at 309.096 nm. From these, they report 386.59 +- 0.03 kJ/mol and 386.62 +- 0.05 kJ/mol. However, their analysis seems to be using non-existent rotational levels of O2 (a 1Deltag) corresponding to J=1 and 0. From these three values they derive a consensus value of 386.59 +- 0.04 kJ/mol and use the same nu00 and E(O2, 1D2) as Takahashi 1997 (see note O3c) to derive D0(O3) = 102.48 +- 0.04 kJ/mol. If the PHOFEX experiment is interpreted in the same manner as Takahashi 1997 in note O3c, it produces 8555.5 +- 3.1 cm-1 = 102.35 +- 0.04 kJ/mol. Assuming that the two 2D imaging results refer to J=0, they need to be increased by 8.507 cm-1, yielding 32324.9 +- 2.5 cm-1 and 32327.4 +- 4.2 cm-1. Proceeding as with the PHOFEX experiment yields 8565.0 +- 2.5 cm-1 = 102.46 +- 0.03 kJ/mol and 8567.5 +- 4.2 cm-1 = 102.49 +- 0.05 kJ/mol. The two 2D imaging results clearly agree with each other. The PHOFAX experiment can be also brought into better agreement by assuming that the onset refers to the hypothetical J=0 level of O2(a 1Deltag), and hence needs to be inreased by 8.507 cm-1 = 0.10 kJ/mol, yielding 102.45 +- 0.04 kJ/mol. In that case the consensus value appears to be 102.46 +- 0.04 kJ/mol, which - because of cancellation of errors - is only 0.02 kJ/mol lower than their original value.

Reference Label

Details

Taniguchi 1999

N. Taniguchi, K. Takahashi, Y. Matsumi, S. M. Dylewski, J. D. Geiser, and P. L. Houston, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 6350-6355 (1999)
Determination of the Heat of Formation of O3 using Vacuum Ultraviolet Laser-Induced Fluorescence Spectroscopy and Two-Dimensional Product Imaging Techniques

note O3d

Taniguchi 1999 report three experiments: one PHOFEX and two 2D fragment imaging. The PHOFEX shows an onset of 309.45 +- 0.03 nm = 32315.4 +- 3.1 cm-1 = 386.58 +- 0.04 kJ/mol, which is, as noted by the authors, somewhat higher (78.1 cm-1 or 0.93 kJ/mol) than the similar experiment of Takahashi 1997. Two 2D imaging experiments were performed, one at 305.746 nm and one at 309.096 nm. From these, they report 386.59 +- 0.03 kJ/mol and 386.62 +- 0.05 kJ/mol. However, their analysis seems to be using non-existent rotational levels of O2 (a 1Deltag) corresponding to J=1 and 0. From these three values they derive a consensus value of 386.59 +- 0.04 kJ/mol and use the same nu00 and E(O2, 1D2) as Takahashi 1997 (see note O3c) to derive D0(O3) = 102.48 +- 0.04 kJ/mol. If the PHOFEX experiment is interpreted in the same manner as Takahashi 1997 in note O3c, it produces 8555.5 +- 3.1 cm-1 = 102.35 +- 0.04 kJ/mol. Assuming that the two 2D imaging results refer to J=0, they need to be increased by 8.507 cm-1, yielding 32324.9 +- 2.5 cm-1 and 32327.4 +- 4.2 cm-1. Proceeding as with the PHOFEX experiment yields 8565.0 +- 2.5 cm-1 = 102.46 +- 0.03 kJ/mol and 8567.5 +- 4.2 cm-1 = 102.49 +- 0.05 kJ/mol. The two 2D imaging results clearly agree with each other. The PHOFAX experiment can be also brought into better agreement by assuming that the onset refers to the hypothetical J=0 level of O2(a 1Deltag), and hence needs to be inreased by 8.507 cm-1 = 0.10 kJ/mol, yielding 102.45 +- 0.04 kJ/mol. In that case the consensus value appears to be 102.46 +- 0.04 kJ/mol, which - because of cancellation of errors - is only 0.02 kJ/mol lower than their original value.